Original World Bank Cost-Efficiency Indicators: Then & Now

BY BILL KATZENSTEIN

October 5, 2023

The Bank’s first review of its expenses in relation to lending, conducted in 1955, centered on three graphs illustrating the record of expenses and operations back to its startup. The graphs, updated in original format over the history of the institution, are presented below (click to expand), followed by commentary with historical perspective.

Bank Expenses and Lending Since 1946

 

 

Figure 1 shows Bank/IDA Net Administrative Expenses in current dollars (i.e., actual as recorded) and as estimated in constant FY24 dollars.1/  Expenses indicated are for what in the recent past has been labeled either the Total Administrative Budget or Total Net Administrative Budget, comprising Bank expenses net of reimbursables and fee income.

Figure 2 plots Net Administrative Expenses as estimated in constant FY24 dollars against numbers of new IBRD/IDA operations (i.e., new lending projects by fiscal year excluding supplements or additions to projects approved in prior years). This figure has not to my knowledge been published or in the public domain since 2015; for periods since then it is based on my own count of new projects and review of project descriptions.

Figure 3 juxtaposes Net Administrative Expenses and total IBRD/IDA lending commitments approved by fiscal year, in current dollars as recorded.

Historical Perspective

A key finding with regard to recent history is that the Bank has exercised moderation in budgeting over the past two decades. Net administrative expenses expressed in constant dollars (i.e., adjusted for the estimated impacts of inflation) are at about the same level as 20 years ago, notwithstanding some peaks and valleys, while IBRD/IDA lending reached new highs in the past two fiscal years. Note: The decrease in expenses in real terms in FY21-22 largely reflects the reduction in travel due to Covid.

Looking at the long term, interpretation of the graphs has to be highly qualified with respect to the originally intended purpose of the series as primary cost-efficiency indicators. Bank operational work has of course evolved terrifically in scope and diversity, methodology and technology, and (decreased) relative cost of lending preparation and supervision since the founding of the organization. In particular, in viewing the long-term trend of expenses in relation to amounts of lending by fiscal year, a number of developments that are not evident from the graphs should be noted as follows.

Increases in Non-Lending Operational Work

The time-recording system used to gauge the amounts of staff time and other resources devoted to the gamut of Bank operational and support functions has been operating since the early 1970s. The record indicates that the costs of Bank lending activity per se (i.e., project preparation and supervision) decreased as a percentage of total Bank expenses from roughly 45% in the 1980s to as low as 20% in FY12. What had occurred in the interim? To start, a new array of operational Business Activities emerged and expanded, including Knowledge Management, External Partnerships and Outreach, Resource Mobilization, and Quality Assurance.

Sources of Cost Savings 

Funding for the new or expanded non-lending operational activities was partly availed through a second development that took effect beginning in the 1990s: reduced time and costs of lending preparation and supervision made possible by operating efficiencies from modern information, analytical and communication technologies. Further, decentralization and outsourcing, in tandem with technical innovation, were engaged in an ongoing effort to contain or reduce costs of work across the gamut of Bank activities, that further contributed to budget restraint. Finally, other measures of cost control, such as increased fee income and reimbursables as partial offsets to increasing overhead expenses, and reductions in certain staff benefit costs, are also credited with the budget control exercised over the past quarter century.

__________

1/

In 2014 and extending through 2018, at a time of very low inflation, the Bank adopted a more nominal budgeting approach (i.e., determining budgets without separate or any automatic adjustments for inflation). Documentation and indexing of administrative expense price inflators over multiyear periods were discontinued. To update the historical budget price index for the impact of inflation since then, I have applied dated Board-approved methodology to retrospectively estimate annual inflation impacts on Bank expenses.

KEYWORDS   , , , ,


LEAVE A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.


COMMENTS

  1. Thomas O'Brien

    very informative Bill, and some surprising–and perhaps reassuring–observations here. thanks for sharing


Recent Blog Posts


Chile under Neoliberalism*
April 16, 2024 | Andrés Solimano & Gabriela Zapata-Román

In our book, Chilean Economic Development under Neoliberalism, we examine Chile’s economic, social, and development policies over the past six decades. The focal

>> Click Here
Discovering Birds with Better Technology
March 17, 2024 | S, Ramachandran

Birding was not on my post-retirement “to do” list.  Stumbling into it just when technology made it easier was fortuitous because it

>> Click Here
Ashoka the Visionary
March 1, 2024 | Ashok Khanna*

In an era of great economic advances, fantastic improvements in education and global communications, humanity is still plagued by war, genocide, and

>> Click Here
Vinod Prakash, Service Before Self: A Journey of Conviction, Courage, and Commitment
February 23, 2024 | Uma Lele

It is a pleasure to write this blog about a book written by a colleague, Vinod Prakash, who retired from the World

>> Click Here
The Bank’s Ambitious Gender Strategy
February 1, 2024 | Frank Vogl*

The World Bank is on the cusp of finalizing a 2024-2030 gender development strategy. It draws on the experiences of the last

>> Click Here
View All Blog Posts